Calvin Barry Fraud top bannerCalvin Barry Fraud top banner

Limitation periods and amendments of pleadings

Region: Ontario Answer # 1535

Sometimes, instead of making a claim for fraud, victims plead breach of contract or negligent misrepresentation. They might do this to avoid adverse costs (which means pay for the fraudster’s costs) that could be imposed on a fraud victim if they cannot prove that a fraud occurred. The problem in making a claim based on breach of contract or negligent misrepresentation arises when, to avoid repaying the debt, the fraudster defendant declares bankruptcy. This happens often. It is important to note, that with a claim for negligence or breach of contract, the victim is not entitled to obtain a declaration that the ‘fraud’ and the outstanding debt will survive bankruptcy.

At that point, in order to obtain a declaration that the debt will survive the defendant’s bankruptcy, some victims try to change their Statement of Claim (referred to as ‘amend a pleading’) to include an allegation of fraud. Amending a pleading after the limited period – in most provinces it is two years after the discovery of the fraud – makes it possible for the defendant fraudster to bring a defence based on the expiration of the limitation period.

If you discover you are a victim of fraud, it is a good idea to contact a fraud recovery expert for advice.

If you a have a criminal record due to fraud-related charges (or for any other criminal offence), and wish to erase your record, call toll-free 1-888-808-3628 or learn more at Pardon Partners. It’s easier than you think.

Pardon Partners – Fraud ONPardon Partners – Fraud ON


You now have 3 options:

Request permission for your organization to copy information from this website.

Page loaded. Thank you